On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 02:50:28PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 08:01:55PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > > Am 02.09.2016 um 16:49 schrieb Leo Famulari: > > > + (name "acme-client") > > I strongly suggest using a different name, as this is *one* of many > > implementations and it is not the "official" one. > Suggestions?
Is there other reasonably widely used software with this name? Our package guidelines say to use the upstream name. Andreas
