On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 08:01:55PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > Am 02.09.2016 um 16:49 schrieb Leo Famulari: > > + (name "acme-client") > > I strongly suggest using a different name, as this is *one* of many > implementations and it is not the "official" one.
Suggestions? > *shiver* Why would one implement this in an language like C, which is > prone to buffer overflows, if there are implementations available in > more secure languages? I wouldn't propose this package if it wasn't part of OpenBSD's base system: http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.sbin/acme-client/
