Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> writes: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 02:50:28PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 08:01:55PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote: >> > Am 02.09.2016 um 16:49 schrieb Leo Famulari: >> > > + (name "acme-client") >> > I strongly suggest using a different name, as this is *one* of many >> > implementations and it is not the "official" one. >> Suggestions? > > Is there other reasonably widely used software with this name? Our package > guidelines say to use the upstream name.
I don't know about widely used, but searching "acme-client" on github shows four projects with this name, neither of which is this package. Many distros prefix OpenBSD projects with ambigous names with "openbsd-". E.g. "openbsd-netcat", "openbsd-ntpd" etc. We don't appear to have that problem yet, but I think this could be a good precedent. -marius
