On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 02:30:06PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 04:48:18PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:58:12AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > > > So, in the future we should probably > > > package espeak-ng as well, for the sake of users that need speech > > > synthesis. It will conflict with espeak since the output binaries have > > > the same names. > > > > From what you write, would it not be better to directly package espeak-ng > > and to drop espeak? > > Eventually we should do that, but for now I think we should provide the > espeak that users are familiar with. I am not sure how much the > interface has changed in espeak-ng, if at all. I'm going to try it out > soon.
There's a WIP patch for espeak-ng available here if anyone wants to take a crack at making it work: https://github.com/lfam/guix/commits/contrib-espeak I think the error it fails on is corrected on the git master branch. I'll try it soon. > > > > > Andreas > > >
