On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 04:48:18PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:58:12AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > > So, in the future we should probably > > package espeak-ng as well, for the sake of users that need speech > > synthesis. It will conflict with espeak since the output binaries have > > the same names. > > From what you write, would it not be better to directly package espeak-ng > and to drop espeak?
Eventually we should do that, but for now I think we should provide the espeak that users are familiar with. I am not sure how much the interface has changed in espeak-ng, if at all. I'm going to try it out soon. > > Andreas >
