On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 00:19 +0200, phcoder wrote:
> I already understood what you meant in first mail. Sorry for not paying
> attention to this detail. Here is my proposition. IT decreases the size
> from 31224 to 31068 bytes. I tested it with following input
> grub_printf ("Hello World: %d %ld %lld %x %lx %llx %u %lu %llu\n",
> 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff, 0xffffffffffffffffLL,
> 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff, 0xffffffffffffffffLL,
> 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff, 0xffffffffffffffffLL);
> grub_printf ("Hello World: %d %ld %lld %x %lx %llx %u %lu %llu\n",
> 0x0fffffff, 0x0fffffff, 0x0fffffffffffffffLL,
> 0x0fffffff, 0x0fffffff, 0x0fffffffffffffffLL,
> 0x0fffffff, 0x0fffffff, 0x0fffffffffffffffLL);
> Output was:
> Hello World: -1 -1 -1 ffffffff ffffffff ffffffffffffffff 4294967295
> 4294967295 18446744073709551615
> Hello World: 268435455 268435455 1152921504606846975 fffffff fffffff
> fffffffffffffff 268435455 268435455 1152921504606846975
Thanks for the patch and for the test! You patch doesn't look as
pedantic as mine, but apparently the compiler can optimize you code
better. I have no objections to your patch.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
