I do not agree with having separate grub_itoa/grub_ltoa/grub_lltoa in
kernel where the size is critical. We should have only lltoa and use it
in all contexts. I know because of divmod64 it's slower than ltoa or
itoa but it's used only for output so speed isn't so important
David Miller wrote:
From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" <ok...@enbug.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:19:49 +0900
On Saturday 11 April 2009 17:08:29 David Miller wrote:
The grub printf code tries to treat 'long' and 'int' the same,
that doesn't work on (most) 64-bit platforms.
Right. Good finding.
Committed. Thanks for reviewing.
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
--
Regards
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
