On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 21:10 +0200, phcoder wrote: > I do not agree with having separate grub_itoa/grub_ltoa/grub_lltoa in > kernel where the size is critical.
Nice catch! > We should have only lltoa and use it > in all contexts. I know because of divmod64 it's slower than ltoa or > itoa but it's used only for output so speed isn't so important I agree. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
