> -                 grub_ltoa (tmp, c, l);
> +                 grub_lltoa (tmp, c, l);
>                 }
>               else
>                 {
>                   n = va_arg (args, int);
> -                 grub_itoa (tmp, c, n);
> +                 grub_lltoa (tmp, c, n);

Do you think they deserve a comment saying why lltoa and that e.g. grub_ltoa 
would work equally well there except for space reasons?  (In case we ever 
decided to change that code back, it would be easier to figure out.)

-Isaac



_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel

Reply via email to