On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 4:03 PM, <tucker.mckni...@gmail.com> wrote: > > You say that "users have choices, and there's room for new, better > entrants to come in with better offerings." But that is more difficult when > one of the major browsers exclusively partners with one company. It'll be > harder for the read-it-later market to be effectively contended if Mozilla > keeps this exclusivity. >
This is absolutely untrue. As Mike already stated: > For now, yes. I don't believe that to be the long term plan. Until > 1.0 Firefox only shipped with Google. The first version of the > Social API was Facebook only. Something has to go first, and > it's way easier to do that with a single partner for a v1. So you saying that it's more difficult runs contrary to what Mozilla has done historically, and successfully. -- -Sheeri Cabral Manager, Data Team at Mozilla File a bug for the Data Team - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Data%20%26%20BI%20Services%20Team Find the Data team on #data on irc.mozilla.org _______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
