On Sunday, June 14, 2015 at 7:33:51 PM UTC-5, Angly Cat wrote:
> On Monday, June 15, 2015 at 6:25:54 AM UTC+6, B Galliart wrote:
> > contributors will have to reverse engineer from the code what the new 
> > private calls do.
> 
> I just want to point that according to the Pocket(tm) Terms of Service[1]:
> 
> > LICENSE RESTRICTIONS
> >
> > Your access to and use of the Pocket Technologies is subject to this 
> > Agreement and all applicable laws and regulations. You may not: (1) modify, 
> > translate, reverse engineer, decompile, disassemble, or create any 
> > derivative works based on the Pocket Technologies
> 
> So it's even forbidden to create private servers if that private servers will 
> utilize API integrated in Firefox (because that API is under Pocket(tm) ToS, 
> isn't is?).
> 
> [1] https://getpocket.com/tos

Yes, that is my understanding under the Terms of Service as well.

Only clarification that Pocket(TM) has gotten back to me on is that the 
"/v3/firefox/save" call is private/undocumented by design.  So far they haven't 
clarified the conflict between contributing to an open source project and their 
Terms of Service.  It seems like they could clear up a lot of controversy just 
by stating how much of the ToS actually applies to their firefox integration 
and how much does not.  The fact they won't provide any such clarification 
makes me assume the worst.
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to