On 6/18/15 12:38 AM, Sheeri Cabral wrote:
There's respectfully asking "why was this decision made?" and "sharing concerns" and then there's aggressively hounding with a never-ending stream of questions. I feel like, at this point, as explanations have been given, this conversation is tipping into the latter.

I'm not sure if you've read all the comments in this thread, but if you do you'll see that some basic questions haven't been answered:

- Is the plan actually to open this feature up with a documented API and in a way that doesn't privilege a single proprietary service?

- If so:

  - When?

- How can we reconcile that with the way this feature has been developed so far (in secret, not on the normal release track, neither with a public API nor positioned as one, and with trademarks in the pref and the toolbar)?

  - What can we do to help move the process along?

If you have answers for these questions, please share them. If not, I'm not sure why you're trying to derail the conversation before they're answered.

Saying, "hey, these people are experts, are you an expert in this particular field?" is NOT an insult. My specialty is databases, and if I started hounding Finance, it's perfectly reasonable for someone to point out that hey, I'm not a Finance expert, maybe those people know just a bit more than I do, and I should accept what they're saying, even if I don't agree with it or 100% understand it. In fact, it's someone pointing out that perhaps I should have compassion and respect. Asking me to respect others is not an insult to me.

I think your previous message [1] was grossly inappropriate coming from a Mozilla employee and deserves an apology, not a clarification. We're not discussing database design or tax law. The concepts here — transparency, privacy, software freedom, interoperability, the commercial/non-commercial balance — are central to the Mozilla mission and basic principles of FOSS development, and to suggest that the people posting here haven't thought about or don't understand those issues simply because they don't work for Mozilla is offensive. Beyond that, this was by and large a perfectly respectful discussion on both sides (with a few exceptions, of which you're now one) before you showed up and told a community of open-source contributors to "Give it a rest and let the experts handle their jobs".


[1] https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.governance/2PYq2w8tejs/24XlPXQddTgJ
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to