On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Rubén Martín <nukea...@mozilla-hispano.org> wrote: > My main fear is that now that Mozilla implements a way to work with DRM, > it would be more common for sites to use it since every browser supports > it, instead of exploring other ways as watermarking.
Different browsers support different DRMs with EME. As of today, 4 different EME-compatible DRMs are known: a different one for each major browser. Paying for the licenses and operation of four different DRM servers seems like an endeavor that sites would not embark on just because things are available. Rather, it seems more likely that deployment will be driven by business requirements from suppliers (studios or record labels; yes, *subscription* music still comes under DRM). But still, indeed, it is possible that EME-style DRM ends up increasing the use of DRM compared to NPAPI-style DRM. We don't know yet. -- Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fi https://hsivonen.fi/ _______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
