El 14/05/14 20:57, Gijs Kruitbosch escribió:
> There was a town hall about this earlier today. Did the invite not
> reach you? A lot of this was already discussed.
It seems that email didn't reach a lot of people, I'll have to watch the
Town Hall recording.
>>    * We want to get rid of plugins but we implement something that
>> always
>>      depends on an external and proprietary module.
>>        o It won't be impossible to access the full web using open source
>
> Double negatives? I guess you mean it won't be possible? (I will also
> note that as much as possible of this implementation *is* open source
> - but the CDM itself never can be, because of the content industry
> dictating the requirements there)
Yes, my bad, "It won't be possible".
>
>>          bits, since if we also agree on this, even people not using DRM
>>          right now are going to switch to it eventually.
>
> This assumes a slippery slope which I don't think is fair. We will
> continue to push for alternative and better solutions. If those are
> more compelling than DRM, I don't think "they" (who, who aren't
> already using it?) will necessarily switch to DRM "eventually".
My main fear is that now that Mozilla implements a way to work with DRM,
it would be more common for sites to use it since every browser supports
it, instead of exploring other ways as watermarking.

Probably it was me, but the article wording was too complex and didn't
summarize what Boris wrote:
  * Not shipping it by default (the CDM module).
  * Requiring explicit user content before downloading the CDM.
  * Insisting on a CDM that is sandboxed so it can't do things that we
don't allow it to do: no phoning home, no persistent user tracking, etc.
  * Working to make it possible for others to support the functionality
while still compiling their own Firefox. Builds provided by Linux
distributions are the obvious target here.

Press is going to write about "Mozilla implementing DRM" which based of
what I've learnt from your responses is not accurate, since right now we
are allowing DRM via plugins.

Regards.

-- 
Rubén Martín [Nukeador]
Mozilla Reps Mentor
http://www.mozilla-hispano.org
http://twitter.com/mozilla_hispano
http://facebook.com/mozillahispano

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to