Hi, I've just found these two articles with the announcement:
https://hacks.mozilla.org/2014/05/reconciling-mozillas-mission-and-w3c-eme/ https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2014/05/14/drm-and-the-challenge-of-serving-users/ And since I can't find where the discussion about this took place, I would like to open discussion here. I'm still shocked and don't understand what's going on: * It's not the first time we take decisions because everyone else is doing it, and we want to keep being relevant. o This worries me the most looking at the future, since we are going to be always the only ones with completely different values to the rest of the players in the browser ecosystem. o Have we lost hope to be enough relevant to avoid these situations? * We want to get rid of plugins but we implement something that always depends on an external and proprietary module. o It won't be impossible to access the full web using open source bits, since if we also agree on this, even people not using DRM right now are going to switch to it eventually. Regards. -- Rubén Martín [Nukeador] Mozilla Reps Mentor http://www.mozilla-hispano.org http://twitter.com/mozilla_hispano http://facebook.com/mozillahispano
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
