Typically WASM performance is compared to JavaScript - ie. faster than JavaScript usually 1.5-10x.
People don’t usually compare WASM with native apps. > On Sep 22, 2023, at 7:04 PM, Robert Engels <reng...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > WASM goes through the browser - so it is very different. Are you using OpenGL > or similar? > >>> On Sep 22, 2023, at 3:44 PM, Stephen Illingworth >>> <stephen.illingwo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >> I'm comparing the results of a program compiled for AMD64 and WASM >> architectures. The code is the same except for the change of architecture. >> The size of the difference in performance is unexpected to me but maybe it's >> normal. >> >>> On Friday, 22 September 2023 at 20:16:20 UTC+1 Robert Engels wrote: >>> When you say negative performance are you talking about a native app >>> running directly on the hardware what are you referring to exactly >>> >>>>> On Sep 22, 2023, at 1:03 PM, Stephen Illingworth <stephen.i...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>> >>>> I've been thinking some more about this problem this week. I found the >>>> performance profiler in Chrome and can see that the each frame is taking >>>> longer than the required 16.7ms to create. The duration for each frame is >>>> more like 100ms. The native performance meanwhile can reach about 7ms. I >>>> expected a drop in performance but not that much. >>>> >>>> If anyone can offer any insight or if these figures seem wrong then I'd >>>> love to take some advice. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Stephen >>>> >>>>>> On Saturday, 16 September 2023 at 09:02:34 UTC+1 Stephen Illingworth >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> I have tried running it in Firefox and Chromium. The webserve.sh script >>>>>> in the ebiten_test folder runs a small httpd server to serve up the >>>>>> binary to the browser. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Saturday, 16 September 2023 at 08:45:52 UTC+1 Brian Candler wrote: >>>>>>> What WASM runtime are you using to execute the code? >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>> "golang-nuts" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>>> email to golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/d8926ffb-9ca3-48ac-aabc-76a8a43947dan%40googlegroups.com. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "golang-nuts" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/1123a2da-3862-4da8-baf5-bc67dd2b7e6en%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/3C5CC55B-8356-4DF5-8E56-9CC067618A38%40ix.netcom.com.
