When you say negative performance are you talking about a native app running directly on the hardware what are you referring to exactly
> On Sep 22, 2023, at 1:03 PM, Stephen Illingworth > <stephen.illingwo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I've been thinking some more about this problem this week. I found the > performance profiler in Chrome and can see that the each frame is taking > longer than the required 16.7ms to create. The duration for each frame is > more like 100ms. The native performance meanwhile can reach about 7ms. I > expected a drop in performance but not that much. > > If anyone can offer any insight or if these figures seem wrong then I'd love > to take some advice. > > Regards > Stephen > >> On Saturday, 16 September 2023 at 09:02:34 UTC+1 Stephen Illingworth wrote: >> I have tried running it in Firefox and Chromium. The webserve.sh script in >> the ebiten_test folder runs a small httpd server to serve up the binary to >> the browser. >> >> >> >>> On Saturday, 16 September 2023 at 08:45:52 UTC+1 Brian Candler wrote: >>> What WASM runtime are you using to execute the code? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/d8926ffb-9ca3-48ac-aabc-76a8a43947dan%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/BEAAB244-A30A-46D0-B6AB-B155091E12BA%40ix.netcom.com.
