On 18-03-2021, Tyler Compton wrote: > I think we all want to stick our noses in this thread. I'm going to stick > my nose in it too :) > > Space, I don't think you'll ever be happy as a result of this discussion, > no matter what evidence or arguments others provide you. I think the fact > is that you were burned by the outcome of the generics proposal. You didn't > have the time to review the draft proposal and engage with the discussion > early, and you disagree with the resulting outcome. That's unfortunate and > I'm sorry it happened. I hope you don't feel that people are trying to > convince you that you weren't burned. Nothing feels worse than having your > concerns trivialized. > > However, you have to understand that just because you were burned doesn't > mean that those around you making these decisions are bad actors. There are > probably small ways that this process could have been improved, but I don't > think they would have changed the outcome. The reality is that after many > iterations, the Go team created a proposal that a large enough number of Go > users found beneficial for it to be accepted. I know you disagree with > them, but our responsibility as members of this community is to > exercise our right to disagree without resorting to attacks on character. I > hope I've been able to address your concerns and disagree with you without > making you feel I'm attacking your character. > > To those who are still attempting to provide evidence that the generics > proposal process was conducted in good faith, I think you've done > everything you need to do and it's probably best to just let this one go.
+1 -- wilk -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/s30g04%24ie7%241%40ciao.gmane.io.
