On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 4:00 AM Space A. <reexist...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The design draft was put up for discussion for months before it became > a formal proposal. It was not new. > > There is always a "discussion", most people (as well as I) will look only at > the final version of proposal, if and when they have time. And what's the > point of having formal proposals if you don't respect that process? Once you > published, please notify everyone and give them time to come back with > critics. Or just do what you do, but don't tell me or anyone that there is > any "community" behind, "decade of discussion" and all that stuff.
I think we've been clear as we were able about the process over the past several years. I'm sorry that it wasn't clear to you. > > The formal proposal (https://golang.org/issue/43651) got 1784 thumbs > up and 123 thumbs down (and ten "confused"). Yes, there were critics. > But I think it is fair to say that the proposal has far more > supporters than critics. > > LOL. You LOCKED that issue (including emojis!). You locked because Russ or > whoever is responsible for the process in the company, was afraid that it > will be like with "try" proposal. So please don't. And are you saying that > "consensus" is how many emojis "up", "down" or "confused" were collected? You > know that it's pretty easy to cheat with that system right? Russ locked the proposal issue after it was accepted. Ian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAOyqgcXiOVWwV0gdeRXht1P0J81x%2BCrES7oFJQc%2B2Onw6gFE3w%40mail.gmail.com.
