The same as you just did, completely ignored everything I said in this
thread.

чт, 18 мар. 2021 г. в 16:25, Axel Wagner <axel.wagner...@googlemail.com>:

> I find your response disrespectful. You are completely ignoring (in the
> sense of "refusing to take notice of") what I wrote.
> I don't think it is possible to have a productive conversation as long as
> you behave this way.
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 1:48 PM Space A. <reexist...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> That's exactly what I'm saying, topic of dropping generics was never
>> raised, so landing of some version of generics was implied by the process.
>> In fact just a start of that process implied that dropping them entirely
>> was never a question. There was no public discussion with that regard, no
>> poll or anything.
>>
>>
>>
>> четверг, 18 марта 2021 г. в 15:42:44 UTC+3, axel.wa...@googlemail.com:
>>
>>> ISTM that we already provided a bunch of evidence, which you are
>>> rejecting. so "any evidence" clearly is not good enough and you should be a
>>> bit more specific.
>>>
>>> Just to name a few specific examples of evidence provided:
>>> • The FAQ, as well as any interview of the question, have stated clearly
>>> that generics *may* be added, if a satisfying design is found. "May", not
>>> "will".
>>> • The proposal process
>>> <https://github.com/golang/proposal#the-proposal-process> clearly
>>> mentions the option to reject a proposal.
>>> • This push for including generics started simultaneously, using the
>>> same process <https://blog.golang.org/go2draft>, as both the "Error
>>> handling" and the "Error values" designs. "Error values" was accepted and
>>> "Error handling" was rejected as results of that process, so rejection was
>>> clearly a possible outcome.
>>> • Since then, there have been numerous blog posts, threads on this
>>> mailing list, talks at conferences and appearances on podcasts by the Go
>>> team. All of them mention the possibility that generics might not happen.
>>> All threads (that I'm aware of) publicly discussing generics discuss the
>>> option not to include them at all at least once.
>>>
>>> I really don't think it's too much to ask, what level of evidence you
>>> are actually looking for. I also strongly feel that the case made by us is
>>> stronger than the case made that there was no discussion about giving up on
>>> generics. The latter seems - as far as I can tell - mainly rely on a)
>>> interpreting statements by members of the Go team in ways incompatible with
>>> the actual words being said and b) speculating about the management process
>>> at Google - without any evidence to base this speculation on.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 1:11 PM Space A. <reexi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> > What kind of proof would you find to be acceptable?  Can you give an
>>>> example of something that I could say that you would consider to be a
>>>> good answer to that question?  Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Ian, seriously. ANY evidence please, which you think "proves" that
>>>> there was an open and public discussion on dropping generics from your
>>>> daily agenda and focusing and spending time on more important things, such
>>>> as first class Android support.
>>>>
>>>> ср, 17 мар. 2021 г. в 22:44, Ian Lance Taylor <ia...@golang.org>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 4:28 AM Space A. <reexi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Can you provide any proof that there was an open public discussion?
>>>>>
>>>>> What kind of proof would you find to be acceptable?  Can you give an
>>>>> example of something that I could say that you would consider to be a
>>>>> good answer to that question?  Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "golang-nuts" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/1624a7bf-1418-4a24-9e11-5ba8c76852b3n%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/1624a7bf-1418-4a24-9e11-5ba8c76852b3n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CADKwOTdE5JkAqrq1q%3DMerb%2BXGjZFCxYN-KZrb5mgctTGCbL7YQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to