Hi, ok, so please read it finally and tell which point exactly you think was against CoC and in what of my messages and in which exact thread, but do not put my words out of context. And explain why you responded just now, and to my message to a person who obviously *violated* its terms by aggressively turning to my personality.
Do you protect this aggressive behavior just because you pro-generics and silently hate everything I will say (and me personally)? Because if you do, it's quite stupid. But I hope it's not. чт, 31 дек. 2020 г. в 07:51, Tyler Compton <xavi...@gmail.com>: > Space A, > > >> So switching from subject to my personality and telling me what I should >> and what shouldn't, to whom to listen, and what to read is something in >> line with "code of conduct" which you appeal as the argument of last resort? >> > > I've seen how you carry yourself on this list, and you really should read > the code of conduct. I think your arguments would gain quite a bit more > traction on this list if you presented them in a more respectful way. > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 3:47 PM Space A. <reexist...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Nice. >> >> > You should listen to people who have been doing this much longer than >> you >> Thanks, are you sure you know for how long I've been doing *this* to be >> able to compare? >> > before discarding all their points as "bullshit" >> Have *you* actually read and listened because this is not what I've said? >> > and you should probably review the community code of conduct >> So switching from subject to my personality and telling me what I should >> and what shouldn't, to whom to listen, and what to read is something in >> line with "code of conduct" which you appeal as the argument of last resort? >> >> >> This was actually my first comment on this particular topic. So yea, I >> read and listened before replying. I could have replied to everyone and >> explained in detail, but I value the time of my opponents. And my own time, >> tbh. >> >> >> чт, 31 дек. 2020 г. в 00:03, David Riley <fraveyd...@gmail.com>: >> >>> This topic has shown little other than that a few people here are >>> unwilling to consider points of view other than their own and declare that >>> very real problems are not real. >>> >>> You should listen to people who have been doing this much longer than >>> you have before discarding all their points as "bullshit", and you should >>> probably review the community code of conduct. >>> >>> If you've got nothing constructive to contribute, why bother? >>> >>> >>> - Dave >>> >>> >>> > On Dec 30, 2020, at 3:53 PM, Space A. <reexist...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > "runtime type-casting" >>> > "type safety something" >>> > "boilerplate" >>> > "amount of code" >>> > "benefit something" >>> > "greatly simplified" (for whom?) >>> > >>> > This topic has clearly shown that most people pro-generic have no >>> *real world* problems that they struggle to solve, yet most of them don't >>> even understand what *real world* problems are. >>> >>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "golang-nuts" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CADKwOTek6rrfmMziuj5poy4hAZJ%3DHXsyp-FB96RdUvZ%2BncoJYA%40mail.gmail.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CADKwOTek6rrfmMziuj5poy4hAZJ%3DHXsyp-FB96RdUvZ%2BncoJYA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CADKwOTeXFD8WoGeS4H1OwXnu5N0f-LqcUBGJmUYiCj3BWACkTA%40mail.gmail.com.
