On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 7:38 PM Ian Lance Taylor <i...@golang.org> wrote:
> I don't think this is accurate. Surveys express a clear and > consistent desire for generics that is far ahead of requests for > operator overloading or other language features. No ordering or quantitative comparison was implied. Just that one can always find people wanting well known features from other languages. > (To avoid > misunderstanding I'll say again that changes to the Go language are > not driven by polls.) I know that. The point was actually about that very fact - and its contrast wrt arguments like "folks want XYZ". But I may have not expressed it clearly enough. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAA40n-UQw1VK3r7ag9KzQnVVDHPgFSr8Rsc9psp8vib-YA7VwQ%40mail.gmail.com.
