Space A,
> So switching from subject to my personality and telling me what I should > and what shouldn't, to whom to listen, and what to read is something in > line with "code of conduct" which you appeal as the argument of last resort? > I've seen how you carry yourself on this list, and you really should read the code of conduct. I think your arguments would gain quite a bit more traction on this list if you presented them in a more respectful way. On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 3:47 PM Space A. <reexist...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nice. > > > You should listen to people who have been doing this much longer than you > Thanks, are you sure you know for how long I've been doing *this* to be > able to compare? > > before discarding all their points as "bullshit" > Have *you* actually read and listened because this is not what I've said? > > and you should probably review the community code of conduct > So switching from subject to my personality and telling me what I should > and what shouldn't, to whom to listen, and what to read is something in > line with "code of conduct" which you appeal as the argument of last resort? > > > This was actually my first comment on this particular topic. So yea, I > read and listened before replying. I could have replied to everyone and > explained in detail, but I value the time of my opponents. And my own time, > tbh. > > > чт, 31 дек. 2020 г. в 00:03, David Riley <fraveyd...@gmail.com>: > >> This topic has shown little other than that a few people here are >> unwilling to consider points of view other than their own and declare that >> very real problems are not real. >> >> You should listen to people who have been doing this much longer than you >> have before discarding all their points as "bullshit", and you should >> probably review the community code of conduct. >> >> If you've got nothing constructive to contribute, why bother? >> >> >> - Dave >> >> >> > On Dec 30, 2020, at 3:53 PM, Space A. <reexist...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > "runtime type-casting" >> > "type safety something" >> > "boilerplate" >> > "amount of code" >> > "benefit something" >> > "greatly simplified" (for whom?) >> > >> > This topic has clearly shown that most people pro-generic have no *real >> world* problems that they struggle to solve, yet most of them don't even >> understand what *real world* problems are. >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CADKwOTek6rrfmMziuj5poy4hAZJ%3DHXsyp-FB96RdUvZ%2BncoJYA%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CADKwOTek6rrfmMziuj5poy4hAZJ%3DHXsyp-FB96RdUvZ%2BncoJYA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAA%3DXfu0nbJE9q3P46rEkRjo5nhWPkevJT1DYY2H39zkQhQEM%3Dw%40mail.gmail.com.
