This topic has shown little other than that a few people here are unwilling to 
consider points of view other than their own and declare that very real 
problems are not real.

You should listen to people who have been doing this much longer than you have 
before discarding all their points as "bullshit", and you should probably 
review the community code of conduct.

If you've got nothing constructive to contribute, why bother?


- Dave


> On Dec 30, 2020, at 3:53 PM, Space A. <reexist...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> "runtime type-casting"
> "type safety something"
> "boilerplate"
> "amount of code"
> "benefit something"
> "greatly simplified" (for whom?)
> 
> This topic has clearly shown that most people pro-generic have no *real 
> world* problems that they struggle to solve, yet most of them don't even 
> understand what *real world* problems are.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/DA26E9B9-7B96-4730-BDBB-F2F52EF510FF%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to