在2020年11月15日星期日 UTC+8 下午12:19:07<Kurtis Rader> 写道：
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 7:54 PM Robert Engels <ren...@ix.netcom.com> > wrote: > >> I don’t think a ring buffer works. At least in a traditional ring buffer >> the producer cannot pass the consumer - if the buffer is full the producer >> blocks or drops. Trying to ensure the consumer always reads the most recent >> available item is better (and more simply) served with a shared hand off >> queue. >> > > It is trivial to create a ring buffer type that drops the oldest queued > item when appending a new item if the ring is full. Which would seem to be > the behavior the O.P. wants. The important question in this scenario is > whether such an object must be useful in a `select` statement. If not the > implementation is borderline trivial. > > The ring buffer should work, but it seems to need the consumer to test and sleep when the ring is empty, which is not as efficient as a channel. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/486267f7-c3fc-4563-814a-1fff54bb2d73n%40googlegroups.com.
