I misread the ternary expression. I saw 1:0 as 1.0. Stupid getting old.
On Wednesday, May 1, 2019 at 5:47:44 PM UTC-7, mrpou...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, May 1, 2019 at 1:32:01 PM UTC-7, lgo...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Great example of why future Go updates should include the ternary
>> operator.
>> Your code is mess-ey when written using keywords 'if' or 'switch'
>> but using '?' it becomes much cleaner
>>
>> p.Rect.X += rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyA) ? -1:0 + (rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyD) ? 1
>> : 0 )
>> p.Rect.Y += rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyW) ? -1:0 + (rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyS) ? 1
>> : 0 )
>>
>
> So you want to ignore D unless A is held down, and ignore S unless W is
> held down? I don't think that was the intention of the original code. This
> is the false allure of "simplicity" that actually becomes more complex. The
> original code is boring, but clear.
>
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 1, 2019 at 8:38:10 AM UTC-4, гусь wrote:
>>>
>>> if rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyA) {
>>> p.Rect.X -= 1
>>> }
>>> if rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyD) {
>>> p.Rect.X += 1
>>> }
>>> if rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyW) {
>>> p.Rect.Y -= 1
>>> }
>>> if rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyS) {
>>> p.Rect.Y += 1
>>> }
>>>
>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
