On Wednesday, May 1, 2019 at 1:32:01 PM UTC-7, lgo...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Great example of why future Go updates should include the ternary operator.
> Your code is mess-ey when written using keywords 'if' or 'switch'
> but using '?' it becomes much cleaner
>
> p.Rect.X += rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyA) ? -1:0 + (rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyD) ? 1
> : 0 )
> p.Rect.Y += rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyW) ? -1:0 + (rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyS) ? 1
> : 0 )
>
So you want to ignore D unless A is held down, and ignore S unless W is
held down? I don't think that was the intention of the original code. This
is the false allure of "simplicity" that actually becomes more complex. The
original code is boring, but clear.
>
> On Wednesday, May 1, 2019 at 8:38:10 AM UTC-4, гусь wrote:
>>
>> if rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyA) {
>> p.Rect.X -= 1
>> }
>> if rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyD) {
>> p.Rect.X += 1
>> }
>> if rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyW) {
>> p.Rect.Y -= 1
>> }
>> if rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyS) {
>> p.Rect.Y += 1
>> }
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
