On Wednesday, May 1, 2019 at 8:41:46 AM UTC-4, Jan Mercl wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 2:37 PM гусь <endem...@gmail.com <javascript:>>
> wrote:
> >
> > if rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyA) {
> > p.Rect.X -= 1
> > }
> > if rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyD) {
> > p.Rect.X += 1
> > }
> > if rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyW) {
> > p.Rect.Y -= 1
> > }
> > if rl.IsKeyDown(rl.KeyS) {
> > p.Rect.Y += 1
> > }
>
> A switch statement would be perhaps more readable and certainly better
> performing on average.
>
To clarify. A switch would not work correctly if it was possible for more
than one of these to be true.
I would also point out that go is about creating clear and readable code.
It is less about writing compact code than many other languages. This takes
some getting used to. For example, in C this could be done in two lines
using ternary operators. There is nothing wrong with the code you
presented. It is clear and readable. If you find that it clutters the
function too much, then make it into it's only utility function.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
