So the question is, if people persist in being unspeakably rude, how far can they get away with it?
What kind of a person even wants to know the answer? Thomas On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:42 PM Aldrin Leal <ald...@leal.eng.br> wrote: > Regardless, I wonder what would be the action taken if it were more than a > "warning". > > Would the CoC people issue a "SP" declaration? An Index Comunitum > Prohibitorum? > > -- > -- Aldrin Leal, <ald...@leal.eng.br> / http://about.me/aldrinleal > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Jaana Burcu Dogan <j...@golang.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Nate Finch <nate.fi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It seems like most of the problem with this whole situation comes from the > wording of the "warning" > > Please consider this a warning from the Code of Conduct working group. > > > "consider this a warning" can be interpreted as a threat (though the > "Please" in front should soften it somewhat). I don't think it was > intended as such, but I think it's clear some people do read it that way. > Perhaps just a rewording would prevent such a reaction in the future. > > > I agree. > > The goal of the CoC should be creating awareness that a perspective is > might be perceived differently and let the OP know. The goal here isn't > policing the thoughts. Wording in the email is not helping here. > > On the other hand, I do not think the issue is not the limitation of > expressing the truth as the OP mentions. If a person has a disability, you > don't seek for reasons to announce it on a public forum and then claim you > are the savior of truth. English proficiency issue is similar given native > and fluent users of the English language are clearly more advantaged in > English speaking communities. > > We have many people in the community that are not necessarily using this > language as their primary language and IMHO solely focusing on this fact is > a distraction and received badly on the other hand. > > I agree with some replies here saying that r/golang has far more worse. > Things look like they are cherry-picked because no one uses conduct@ and > once a single case is reported, it is perceived as people are reacting > excessively on a specific case. > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
