On 18-02-2015 19:56, Peter Lebbing wrote: >> Admit it, IPv6 has failed. It may get some uses, but the widespread >> adaptation of carrier NAT has made it largely obsolete.
> Tired as I may be of this discussion (what's your next argument, NAT provides > beneficial firewalling behaviour?), I still wish to say that I will not > "admit" > IPv6 has failed or that IPv4 advancements[1] made it obsolete. Get off your > soapbox. I didn't claim that one version was better than another version, I said it will probably never become widespread. Just like Linux on the desktop is only a small niche player, and windows phone on the smartphone market. Wether I like that or not and which system is best doesn't change anything. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Johan Wevers _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
