> On 18 Feb 2015, at 21:13, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> wrote: > > I'm not convinced that it's gnupg's job to compensate for > unreasonably-configured IPv6 stacks that think they have a route but > actually don’t.
I agree. I think the actual problem should be addressed at the networking level instead of adding logic to GnuPG. -- Ville _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
