On 18/02/15 18:07, Johan Wevers wrote: > Admit it, IPv6 has failed. It may get some uses, but the widespread > adaptation of carrier NAT has made it largely obsolete.
Tired as I may be of this discussion (what's your next argument, NAT provides beneficial firewalling behaviour?), I still wish to say that I will not "admit" IPv6 has failed or that IPv4 advancements[1] made it obsolete. Get off your soapbox. Peter. [1] I shudder to call NAT an advancement, but that's apparently how you present it. -- I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail. You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy. My key is available at <http://digitalbrains.com/2012/openpgp-key-peter> _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
