> Aside from only demonstrating possible earlier intent rather later
> actions, the fraction of comments of "I'll kill you" that actually convert to
> murders is vanishingly small. If I were a juror, this evidence would
> tell me nothing about guilt or otherwise.

One more thing — remember that probabilities are tricksy things.  They vary 
wildly depending on how one looks at the problem.

Let’s say there are 10,000 threats of murder that are made, and only 10 
murders.  If we assume that only ten of those 10,000 threats was connected to a 
murder, the probability of any given threat being connected to a murder is 
vanishingly small — one in a thousand, or 0.1%.  Starting from the fact there 
was a threat, it would be foolish to conclude the speaker intended on murdering 
someone.

However, if we look at the murders, we discover that 100% of them are connected 
to threats.  If you start from a murder, it would be pretty wise to start 
looking into who threatened the person.

If the only fact you have is “Alice threatened Bob’s life,” then yes, that’s 
pretty poor evidence on which to investigate Alice for Bob’s death.  But if the 
facts you have are “Alice threatened Bob’s life and Bob was killed under 
suspicious circumstances,” then yes, that’s actually pretty good evidence on 
which to investigate her.

ObComputerSecurityStuff: this turns out to be a recurring mathematical pattern 
that pops up all over in computer security.  If you have 10,000 IDS red-flags 
warning of catastrophe and catastrophe never happens, that’s a pretty bad 
system… but if in post-incident analysis you discover, “hey, IDS correctly 
reported this when it was happening,” Management will ask you some really harsh 
questions about why you didn’t pay attention to the warnings.  I think this is 
how IDSes manage to get sold: too often we look at them from a postmortem, 
rather than premortem, perspective.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to