-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/06/2015 06:04 PM, MFPA wrote:
<SNIP> > Anyway, we have gone *way* off-topic. My original comment was intended > to convey my general opinion that a publicly-known dossier of > unrelated "identity" events sounds far too invasive to be comfortable. > And later in my posting, the corollary that keybase does not sound > like something attractive to people who, like me, prefer to > compartmentalise the facets of their life as separate "fractions". I also favor compartmentalization. But reading <https://keybase.io/>, I don't see any requirement to include all online identity information, provide government-issued ID, etc, etc, etc. I already use Gravatar <http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/2fb817d36499985e91e5778ed4a0c8b7.png>. Wouldn't Keybase just better link all that to Mirimir's GnuPG key? Or am I missing the point? Is there an expectation that Keybase usernames are not merely pseudonyms? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUrJaBAAoJEGINZVEXwuQ+L6gH/A0z0qyVlF5kiL5L6ZbPup7r pzz65XyllIMXJAlPGTlaxfT/RJw39MwtvlHrzfcspfdvpM3C3WjqquWKrN83dyvl CLT7bYGUkgF2Ziwmw38j7MR9WPC6Yh4VbDHupTZ7Cp7Ita6KT9PT2y4GoSZ1FmCl NE/9Yv9iM2peWYlnNCQQcLQ8Ajtf1CMKCzxMNHXLzNh4tj64Pz0au/WpMQDl78et HXzkh61taINTyLW8wBzHu3ossvHg/HbkNOtW3Y6XnxaNsrdMb7HccfDMHOjmi2KZ +bNSf/xnLN/BvmuKDYMwy/xwqj0WR1iQrmnz2LbQ+vt7q4C1wB1kumwb5Rgiyac= =o0u9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
