jayzhan211 commented on PR #14440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14440#issuecomment-2661178188

   > Thanks for working on this, @jayzhan211. The new behavior of coercion 
signature makes sense to me.
   > 
   > I found I can't access `Coercion` and `ImplicitCoercion` outside the 
crate. I believe we need to publicly use them in `datafusion/expr/src/lib.rs`. 
Maybe we can just set it as below for all struct in `signature`.
   > 
   > ```
   > pub use datafusion_expr_common::signature::*;
   > ```
   
   If you can access Signature, no reason you can't access for `Coercion`. I 
think you should import `datafuison-expr-common` instead since Signature is 
re-exported in `datafusion-expr` for backward compatibility, but not for 
`Coercion` and `ImplicitCoercion`


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to