github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] feat: metadata columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: metadata columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: metadata columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: metadata columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: metadata columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: metadata columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: metadata columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: metadata columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: metadata columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: metadata columns [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Invalid query result when searched CASE has nullable condition and boolean result [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Invalid query result when searched CASE has nullable condition and boolean result [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Invalid query result when searched CASE has nullable condition and boolean result [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Prepared physical plan reusage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Prepared physical plan reusage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Prepared physical plan reusage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Prepared physical plan reusage [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Prepared physical plan reusage [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Concat error while testing "array_repeat" [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Concat error while testing "array_repeat" [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Concat error while testing "array_repeat" [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for DataFusion 45 (bump to DataFusion rev 5592834 + Arrow 54.0.0) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for DataFusion 45 (bump to DataFusion rev 5592834 + Arrow 54.0.0) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for DataFusion 45 (bump to DataFusion rev 5592834 + Arrow 54.0.0) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for DataFusion 45 (bump to DataFusion rev 5592834 + Arrow 54.0.0) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for DataFusion 45 (bump to DataFusion rev 5592834 + Arrow 54.0.0) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for DataFusion 45 (bump to DataFusion rev 5592834 + Arrow 54.0.0) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for DataFusion 45 (bump to DataFusion rev 5592834 + Arrow 54.0.0) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for DataFusion 45 (bump to DataFusion rev 5592834 + Arrow 54.0.0) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for DataFusion 45 (bump to DataFusion rev 5592834 + Arrow 54.0.0) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for DataFusion 45 (bump to DataFusion rev 5592834 + Arrow 54.0.0) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for DataFusion 45 (bump to DataFusion rev 5592834 + Arrow 54.0.0) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for DataFusion 45 (bump to DataFusion rev 5592834 + Arrow 54.0.0) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for DataFusion 45 (bump to DataFusion rev 5592834 + Arrow 54.0.0) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for DataFusion 45 (bump to DataFusion rev 5592834 + Arrow 54.0.0) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for DataFusion 45 (bump to DataFusion rev 5592834 + Arrow 54.0.0) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for DataFusion 45 (bump to DataFusion rev 5592834 + Arrow 54.0.0) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for DataFusion 45 (bump to DataFusion rev 5592834 + Arrow 54.0.0) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for DataFusion 45 (bump to DataFusion rev 5592834 + Arrow 54.0.0) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for DataFusion 45 (bump to DataFusion rev 5592834 + Arrow 54.0.0) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for DataFusion 45 (bump to DataFusion rev 5592834 + Arrow 54.0.0) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Prepare for DataFusion 45 (bump to DataFusion rev 5592834 + Arrow 54.0.0) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] LogicalPlan::get_parameter_types fails to return all placeholders [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] refactor: switch `BooleanBufferBuilder` to `NullBufferBuilder` in binary_map [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: switch `BooleanBufferBuilder` to `NullBufferBuilder` in binary_map [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: switch `BooleanBufferBuilder` to `NullBufferBuilder` in binary_map [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: switch `BooleanBufferBuilder` to `NullBufferBuilder` in binary_map [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: switch `BooleanBufferBuilder` to `NullBufferBuilder` in binary_map [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: Fall back to Spark when hashing decimals with precision > 18 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Fall back to Spark when hashing decimals with precision > 18 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Fall back to Spark when hashing decimals with precision > 18 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Fall back to Spark when hashing decimals with precision > 18 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Fall back to Spark when hashing decimals with precision > 18 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Fall back to Spark when hashing decimals with precision > 18 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Fall back to Spark when hashing decimals with precision > 18 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Fall back to Spark when hashing decimals with precision > 18 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Fall back to Spark when hashing decimals with precision > 18 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] Column for primary key not found in schema if constraint column in uppercase [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Column for primary key not found in schema if constraint column in uppercase [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Release Comet 0.5.0 (Jan 2025) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release Comet 0.5.0 (Jan 2025) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Investigate implications of arrow-rs dropping support for tracking dictionary ids in schema [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Investigate implications of arrow-rs dropping support for tracking dictionary ids in schema [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] refactor: switch `BooleanBufferBuilder` to `NullBufferBuilder` in an unit test of common_scalar [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: switch `BooleanBufferBuilder` to `NullBufferBuilder` in an unit test of common_scalar [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Variant on `AnalysisContext` to represent empty-set [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Make numeric literal underscore test dialect agnostic [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make numeric literal underscore test dialect agnostic [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Clickhouse: Support underscore in numbers [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Clickhouse: Support underscore in numbers [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add support for filter selectivity for more expression types [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: FULL OUTER JOIN and LIMIT produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: FULL OUTER JOIN and LIMIT produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: FULL OUTER JOIN and LIMIT produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: FULL OUTER JOIN and LIMIT produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: FULL OUTER JOIN and LIMIT produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: FULL OUTER JOIN and LIMIT produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: FULL OUTER JOIN and LIMIT produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: FULL OUTER JOIN and LIMIT produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: FULL OUTER JOIN and LIMIT produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Implement `fetch` limit for MemoryExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Implement `fetch` limit for MemoryExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Implement `fetch` limit for MemoryExec [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Feat/parameterized sql queries [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Optimization: support push down limit when full join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimization: support push down limit when full join [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Add test case for incorrect FULL OUTER JOIN + LIMIT pushdown @alamb [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add test case for incorrect FULL OUTER JOIN + LIMIT pushdown @alamb [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add test case for incorrect FULL OUTER JOIN + LIMIT pushdown @alamb [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] `FULL OUTER JOIN` and `LIMIT` produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `FULL OUTER JOIN` and `LIMIT` produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `FULL OUTER JOIN` and `LIMIT` produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `FULL OUTER JOIN` and `LIMIT` produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `FULL OUTER JOIN` and `LIMIT` produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `FULL OUTER JOIN` and `LIMIT` produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `FULL OUTER JOIN` and `LIMIT` produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `FULL OUTER JOIN` and `LIMIT` produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `FULL OUTER JOIN` and `LIMIT` produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] support: Date +/plus Int or date_add function [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] support: Date +/plus Int or date_add function [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] support: Date +/plus Int or date_add function [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: remove DataFusion pyarrow feat [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: remove DataFusion pyarrow feat [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: remove DataFusion pyarrow feat [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: remove DataFusion pyarrow feat [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): update rand_distr requirement from 0.4.3 to 0.5.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): update rand requirement from 0.8 to 0.9 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): update rand requirement from 0.8 to 0.9 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Support multiple tables in `UPDATE FROM` clause [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [PR] moving memory.rs out of datafusion/core [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] moving memory.rs out of datafusion/core [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] moving memory.rs out of datafusion/core [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] moving memory.rs out of datafusion/core [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] moving memory.rs out of datafusion/core [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] moving memory.rs out of datafusion/core [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] moving memory.rs out of datafusion/core [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] moving memory.rs out of datafusion/core [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] moving memory.rs out of datafusion/core [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] moving memory.rs out of datafusion/core [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] moving memory.rs out of datafusion/core [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] moving memory.rs out of datafusion/core [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Ensure `to_timestamp` behaves consistently with PostgreSQL [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Ensure `to_timestamp` behaves consistently with PostgreSQL [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Ensure `to_timestamp` behaves consistently with PostgreSQL [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Ensure `to_timestamp` behaves consistently with PostgreSQL [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] column types must match schema types occurs after `unnest_columns` on another column [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] column types must match schema types occurs after `unnest_columns` on another column [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] column types must match schema types occurs after `unnest_columns` on another column [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] column types must match schema types occurs after `unnest_columns` on another column [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: memory pool error type [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: memory pool error type [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: memory pool error type [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: memory pool error type [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [POC] improve vectorized compare for primitives [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [POC] improve vectorized compare for primitives [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore: reinstate find_df_window_func [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] try to add manual trigger for extended tests in PRs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] try to add manual trigger for extended tests in PRs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] try to add manual trigger for extended tests in PRs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] try to add manual trigger for extended tests in PRs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] add manual trigger for extended tests in pull requests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] add manual trigger for extended tests in pull requests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] add manual trigger for extended tests in pull requests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] add manual trigger for extended tests in pull requests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] add manual trigger for extended tests in pull requests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] add manual trigger for extended tests in pull requests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] add manual trigger for extended tests in pull requests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] add manual trigger for extended tests in pull requests [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Increase MSRV to 1.81.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Increase MSRV to 1.81.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Increase MSRV to 1.81.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Increase MSRV to 1.81.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide user-defined invariants for logical node extensions. [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Feat: support array_compact function [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feat: support array_compact function [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feat: support array_compact function [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feat: support array_compact function [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feat: support array_compact function [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feat: support array_compact function [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feat: support array_compact function [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feat: support array_compact function [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feat: support array_compact function [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feat: support array_compact function [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] WIP: Update to arrow-rs / parquet `54.1.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: Update to arrow-rs / parquet `54.1.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: Update to arrow-rs / parquet `54.1.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: Update to arrow-rs / parquet `54.1.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: Update to arrow-rs / parquet `54.1.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: Update to arrow-rs / parquet `54.1.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: Update to arrow-rs / parquet `54.1.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: Update to arrow-rs / parquet `54.1.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: Update to arrow-rs / parquet `54.1.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: Update to arrow-rs / parquet `54.1.0` [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages