"Arttu V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/7/08, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Let me quote _this_ file to verify that there is a 4 clause BSDL.
>
> Jörg, there are indeed four asterisks/clauses to count. But which
> clause represents the original "GPL-incompatible" advertising clause?
> IANAL, but I cannot see that clause in there.
The 3 clause BSDL is not more "GPL compatible" than the 4 clause BSDl.
RMS was just unwilling to advertize if he did take other people's code.
BTW: The 4 clause BSDL helped UCB to win the case against AT&T.....
But the whole discussion here is a dead end. If people (including you) try to
derail a discussion that used some arguments just as a style element to prove
that Bloch/Debian is wrong, we will never get to a useful result.
I was mentioning "cmake" only to prove that Bloch is highly self contradicting
and that "cdrkit" would of couse be illegal _iff_ the claims he made against
cdrtools were correct.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
