Am Dienstag 08 Juli 2008 10:26:40 schrieb Joerg Schilling: > "Arttu V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/7/08, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Let me quote _this_ file to verify that there is a 4 clause BSDL. > > > > Jörg, there are indeed four asterisks/clauses to count. But which > > clause represents the original "GPL-incompatible" advertising clause? > > IANAL, but I cannot see that clause in there. > > The 3 clause BSDL is not more "GPL compatible" than the 4 clause BSDl. Why not? The FSF itself claims that it is compatible, do you claim it's not? Where do you see problems?
Sascha
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
