On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:55 PM, pk <pete...@coolmail.se> wrote: > On 2013-08-19 19:05, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > > <snipped a whole lot of bollocks> > > I'm beginning to think you are a troll since you consistently > misinterpret what I'm trying to say. This is the last thing I will say > in this matter: Your "technical arguments" are bogus. Yes, I agree that > my point is moot since I don't have the time or resources to steer > Gentoo/Linux in a direction that I would like to see so I guess "put up > or shut up" is appropriate... But if I remember correctly someone else > (i.e. you) on this list a while ago was whining about "systemd is not > supported"...
I didn't whine; I collaborated with bug 318365 [1] so systemd was supported in Gentoo, and then I modified and wrote several ebuilds so we could have an overlay to get rid of OpenRC [3], and then I tried to do as much as possible (bugs 373219, 409385, several others) to get us to where we are today: with systemd almost a first class citizen in Gentoo. When bug 373219 is closed, I would consider that a "mission accomplished". So I didn't whine; I worked to bring the changes I wanted into Gentoo. You should try it; it works. > So I reserve the right to whine about it as well. Oh, please, whine as much as you want. It doesn't change absolutely nothing, though. > A hint for the future: Try to get off your high horse! Seriously? You call telling the facts (with citations, by the way) being on a "high horse"? Jeez. Regards. [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=318365 [2] https://github.com/canek-pelaez/gentoo-systemd-only [3] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373219 [4] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409385 -- Canek Peláez Valdés Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
