On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 10:24:27 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > > But there's not a lot of point as eudev isn't that different to udev > > now, AFAICT, and a recent update forced me to switch back to udev > > because eudev hadn't been updated (on ~amd64). > > Can you elaborate on what this update was that forced you to go back to > regular udev?
I can't remember what it was now, and it may have been avoidable by making virtual/udev-206 (or whichever version it was that needed a higher udev version than eudev could provide). It's moot now as eudev has been updated and portage is happy again, but it would be a concern if this happened regularly. -- Neil Bothwick PC DOS Error #01: Windows loading, come back tomorrow
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
