On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 02:10:28PM +0200, Nuno J. Silva wrote: > > No, actually it doesn't. It just has the same kind of very generic claim > that has been repeated several times in this thread (which is "why? > because it won't work") and links to an article that explains why some > udev rules would silently fail for all this time (for *years* now, I'd > guess). > > The article does not describe a change introduced with 181, it describes > what already happened with previous versions. I am not using >= 181 and > I do see the issues the article mentions (it does not break here because > I do not have a separate /usr, but I can see some rules that use stuff > from /usr).
You have such an obvious lack of understanding, and problem comprehending English, we just don't need to post to you anymore. ;) -- Happy Penguin Computers >') 126 Fenco Drive ( \ Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^ supp...@happypenguincomputers.com 662-269-2706 662-205-6424 http://happypenguincomputers.com/ Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting
