On 2012-12-26 12:55, Neil Bothwick wrote: > That all makes sense, although it may well be harder to implement > than to suggest. To be fair to the udev developers, we owe them > nothing and they are free to take their project in whichever > direction they like and spend their time on whatever features they > choose to. If we don't like it we can fork it. If eudev works and > provides a valid alternative to udev it will simply prove that the > open source ecosystem works in a way that all those trying to avoid > "upgrading" from Windows 7 to 8 can't even dream about. > > There is really no place for the insults and name calling, udev > provided us with a great tool that we were happy to use for years, > now it is moving in a direction we don't like we can either live > with the change or do something about it. Walt chose the latter > route and now the eudev guys are following suit - eudev may not be > ready for use yet but the devs have already achieved a lot more > that all the list complaint and insults ever will.
Very well said! +1 Best regards Peter K
