Mark Knecht wrote: > On 6/16/05, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 22:34:51 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote: >> >> >>>Please correct me if I'm wrong but if what revdep-rebuild does is >>>important then I want to kow about any program on my system that >>>doesn't have all it's dependencies met, right? Seems that OO-bin has >>>this problem and, unless I find out what USE flags the -bi versio was >>>built with and match them in my setup then I'm going to be subject to >>>a problem. (possibly...) >> >>revdep-rebuild is irrelevant to ooo-bin, and others, because you cannot >>rebuild a binary package. All it does is reinstall the same binary, not >>build a new one. >> > > Right, but.....the errors within revdep-rebuild are not irrelivant to > a user who's just run revdep-rebuild and has to sort through a number > of errors to decide what to do. My point was that I'd like to know how > my copy of oo-bin was built/linked so that I could (possibly) set my > systems up so that everything is 100% cool. > > It's only slightly frustrating to deal with that. Not a big deal. And > since oo-bin hasn't crashed on me in quite awhile it would seem that > whatever the dependency issues are they aren't serious. > > thanks, > Mark >
At least on my system, the problem with openoffice-bin-1.9.104 isn't actually broken dynamic links. It's just that ldd complains "ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for `something.so'" for these files: /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/_bsddb.so /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/_tkinter.so /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/bz2.so /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/dbm.so /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/gdbm.so If I chmod +x those files then it stops complaining. Zac /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/readline.so -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
