Zac Medico wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
> 
>>On 6/16/05, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 22:34:51 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Please correct me if I'm wrong but if what revdep-rebuild does is
>>>>important then I want to kow about any program on my system that
>>>>doesn't have all it's dependencies met, right? Seems that OO-bin has
>>>>this problem and, unless I find out what USE flags the -bi versio was
>>>>built with and match them in my setup then I'm going to be subject to
>>>>a problem. (possibly...)
>>>
>>>revdep-rebuild is irrelevant to ooo-bin, and others, because you cannot
>>>rebuild a binary package. All it does is reinstall the same binary, not
>>>build a new one.
>>>
>>
>>Right, but.....the errors within revdep-rebuild are not irrelivant to
>>a user who's just run revdep-rebuild and has to sort through a number
>>of errors to decide what to do. My point was that I'd like to know how
>>my copy of oo-bin was built/linked so that I could (possibly) set my
>>systems up so that everything is 100% cool.
>>
>> It's only slightly frustrating to deal with that. Not a big deal. And
>>since oo-bin hasn't crashed on me in quite awhile it would seem that
>>whatever the dependency issues are they aren't serious.
>>
>>thanks,
>>Mark
>>
> 
> 
> At least on my system, the problem with openoffice-bin-1.9.104 isn't actually 
> broken dynamic links.  It's just that ldd complains "ldd: warning: you do not 
> have execution permission for `something.so'" for these files:
> 
> /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/_bsddb.so
> /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/_tkinter.so
> /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/bz2.so
> /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/dbm.so
> /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/gdbm.so
> /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/readline.so
> 
> If I chmod +x those files then it stops complaining.
> 

I lied, there really are broken dynamic links :-).

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to