Liar! Well, we forgive you, I think =). Actually the better (Gentoo suggested) way to squelch these packages is to exclude /opt from the search path in the revdep-rebuild script. Just do EDITOR `which revdep-rebuild` and take /opt out of the SEARCH_DIRS, most anything that goes in there should be a binary release, but sadly not every binary package ends up in there (azureus-bin comes to mind).
On 6/16/05, Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Zac Medico wrote: > > Mark Knecht wrote: > > > >>On 6/16/05, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>>On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 22:34:51 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Please correct me if I'm wrong but if what revdep-rebuild does is > >>>>important then I want to kow about any program on my system that > >>>>doesn't have all it's dependencies met, right? Seems that OO-bin has > >>>>this problem and, unless I find out what USE flags the -bi versio was > >>>>built with and match them in my setup then I'm going to be subject to > >>>>a problem. (possibly...) > >>> > >>>revdep-rebuild is irrelevant to ooo-bin, and others, because you cannot > >>>rebuild a binary package. All it does is reinstall the same binary, not > >>>build a new one. > >>> > >> > >>Right, but.....the errors within revdep-rebuild are not irrelivant to > >>a user who's just run revdep-rebuild and has to sort through a number > >>of errors to decide what to do. My point was that I'd like to know how > >>my copy of oo-bin was built/linked so that I could (possibly) set my > >>systems up so that everything is 100% cool. > >> > >> It's only slightly frustrating to deal with that. Not a big deal. And > >>since oo-bin hasn't crashed on me in quite awhile it would seem that > >>whatever the dependency issues are they aren't serious. > >> > >>thanks, > >>Mark > >> > > > > > > At least on my system, the problem with openoffice-bin-1.9.104 isn't > > actually broken dynamic links. It's just that ldd complains "ldd: warning: > > you do not have execution permission for `something.so'" for these files: > > > > /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/_bsddb.so > > /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/_tkinter.so > > /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/bz2.so > > /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/dbm.so > > /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/gdbm.so > > /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/readline.so > > > > If I chmod +x those files then it stops complaining. > > > > I lied, there really are broken dynamic links :-). > > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list