On 5/3/05, Calvin Spealman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/3/05, Travis Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why not the sender's for now? > > Why not the recipient's for now? One could almost argue free speech > for expressing one's self in HTML, but I won't go there. > Sorry i should have said that differently, Why not the sender's for now out of courtesy. > If the sender disables HTML, no one gets it. If the recipient disables > HTML, then everyone gets what everyone wants. > You know with thunderbird you can set it per address?
Travis R. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
