On 11/14/14 16:52, PaX Team wrote:
On 14 Nov 2014 at 22:05, "Tóth Attila" wrote:

I would suggest to attach the responsible patch of the missing define only
and the necessary diff of a given ebuild file. That two files could be
enough, I guess.

yes and probably choose a better list and/or open a bugzilla entry as i doubt
this is hardened related at all ;).


For stuff like this just open a bug and cc me. This isn't hardened related but the musl project aims to bring hardening to musl in gentoo. So, you're going to still have to deal with non-hardened musl issue. Open a bug report is probably the way to go with those.


--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D.
Chair of Information Technology
D'Youville College
Buffalo, NY 14201
(716) 829-8197

Reply via email to