Musl is ment to be an alternative to libc. Some of the hardened folks (perverts ;->) are interested to make it work on Hardened Gentoo. But musl itself is not necessary hardened per se. You've linked the Hardened project subpage. The package maintainer happens to be a hardened developer (blueness). So your message probably reaches him. But it's not the optimal channel. So what pageexec tried to advise, is to open a bug in the gentoo bug tracking system and attach your patches and diffs to the bug. But I still suggest to attach a single diff per file. And don't try to use diff as a version control system. Specify sys-libs/musl in the title and the description and it will reach the maintainer of the package, will probably got assigned to him.
https://bugs.gentoo.org Regards: Dw. -- dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057 Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057 2014.November 15.(Szo) 06:25 időpontban daggs ezt írta: > Greetings, > >> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 at 11:52 PM >> From: "PaX Team" <pagee...@freemail.hu> >> To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org >> Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] [PATCH] fix sys-process/cronie >> compilation under gentoo+musl >> >> On 14 Nov 2014 at 22:05, "Tóth Attila" wrote: >> >> > I would suggest to attach the responsible patch of the missing define >> only >> > and the necessary diff of a given ebuild file. That two files could be >> > enough, I guess. >> >> yes and probably choose a better list and/or open a bugzilla entry as i >> doubt >> this is hardened related at all ;). >> >> >> > not sure I understand the latter, this is a issue that is caused by > running gentoo atop of musl, according to this wiki page, > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Hardened_musl I should send the > patches to this list. > > am I wrong? > >
