understood, better yet, I'll ask blueness probably how does he wants the patches.
thanks for the explanation. > Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2014 at 9:33 AM > From: "Tóth Attila" <at...@atoth.sote.hu> > To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] [PATCH] fix sys-process/cronie compilation > under gentoo+musl > > Musl is ment to be an alternative to libc. Some of the hardened folks > (perverts ;->) are interested to make it work on Hardened Gentoo. But musl > itself is not necessary hardened per se. You've linked the Hardened > project subpage. The package maintainer happens to be a hardened developer > (blueness). So your message probably reaches him. But it's not the optimal > channel. So what pageexec tried to advise, is to open a bug in the gentoo > bug tracking system and attach your patches and diffs to the bug. But I > still suggest to attach a single diff per file. And don't try to use diff > as a version control system. Specify sys-libs/musl in the title and the > description and it will reach the maintainer of the package, will probably > got assigned to him. > > https://bugs.gentoo.org > > Regards: > Dw. > -- > dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057 > Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057 > > 2014.November 15.(Szo) 06:25 időpontban daggs ezt írta: > > Greetings, > > > >> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 at 11:52 PM > >> From: "PaX Team" <pagee...@freemail.hu> > >> To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org > >> Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] [PATCH] fix sys-process/cronie > >> compilation under gentoo+musl > >> > >> On 14 Nov 2014 at 22:05, "Tóth Attila" wrote: > >> > >> > I would suggest to attach the responsible patch of the missing define > >> only > >> > and the necessary diff of a given ebuild file. That two files could be > >> > enough, I guess. > >> > >> yes and probably choose a better list and/or open a bugzilla entry as i > >> doubt > >> this is hardened related at all ;). > >> > >> > >> > > not sure I understand the latter, this is a issue that is caused by > > running gentoo atop of musl, according to this wiki page, > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Hardened_musl I should send the > > patches to this list. > > > > am I wrong? > > > > > > > >
