>>>>> On Tue, 25 Jul 2017, Michał Górny wrote: > On wto, 2017-07-25 at 09:26 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: >> There would also be less variation. Bug: 123456 is pretty >> unambiguous as a reference. When you start having http vs https and >> maybe a few different ways of creating a URL to a bug it could get >> messier.
> Except that 123456 could refer to any bugtracker anywhere. No > reasonable tool will do anything with that number since it's > ambiguous by definition. The same applies to #123456 in the summary line, though. I don't see a good reason for using a URL after the "Bug:" keyword as long as bare numbers are used elsewhere. Ulrich
pgpzqtJ6HJtOP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
